Atiyah: Sale of Goods

The Sale of Goods 11th ed Patrick S. Atiyah , John N. Adams , Hector MacQueen

ISBN13: 9780582894082
Published: April 2005
Publisher: Pearson Higher Education
£47.95

Buy

Note: Cases linked in the text on the right are either to BAILII reports (where available) or the Wikipedia reference.

Contract Text

Contents

1. Introduction

2. The Contract of Sale

3. Terms of the contract

4. Exclusion Clauses

5. Title and Passing of Property

6. Retention of Title

7. Nemo Dat

8. Performance of the Contract

9. Remedies of the Seller

10. Remedies of the Buyer

11. Articles on Sale of Goods and Contract issues

12. Drafting Sale Contracts and specimen sale contract

 

Sponsors



Student Subscription
Subscribe to the 2009 Weekly Law Reports & Receive All Parts for 2008 Free!

That's just £90 (£96 overseas) for two years' worth of parts (standard UK subscription cost for 2009: £450).
Contact: 0207 242 6471

Recent Case Law

Cases on Sale of Goods and Contract 2009 - 2000

 

Statutes

Sale of Goods Act 1979

Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994

The Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002

Unfair Contract terms Act 1977

Factors Act 1889

Part III Hire Purchase Act 1964: ss.27 - 29.

Companion Volume

The Law of Contract

 
 
 
 

 




Drafting Sale Contracts

1. Conditions of Sale

Drafting Conditions of Sale

This section is based around a set of conditions of sale. It is an example, and no more, of a set of commercial conditions, and the course aims to demonstrate the thinking that lies behind the choice of terms. No claim is made that the wording of each clause is 'the best' that can be achieved for a particular client, since much depends upon the requirements of the client, and his perceived relationship with his customers. Not every client requires elaborate clauses which at first sight offer maximum protection, but which in practice require lengthy and skilled negotiation in each contract. On the other hand, it is not unreasonable for clients to require that they at least begin negotiations from a comparatively advantageous position.

The example given is of conditions of SALE. Conditions of purchase, hire, hire-purchase, or contracts for service, necessarily require different approaches, although the underlying principles are often the same.

This section consists of the example, together with a list of cases and statutes which illustrate principles or state the law on a particular issue.

1.1 Cases and Statutes

(The numbers below refer to the numbers of the clauses in the example.)

1. Re Bond Worth (1979) 3 WLR 629

Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandels-gesellschaft (1983) AC 34

British Steel Corporation v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd (1984) 1 All ER 504

Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Ltd (1979) 1 All ER 965

2. McGrath v Shah (1989) 57 P&CR 452

3. British Steel Corporation v Cleveland Bridge (Supra)

Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-Cell-O (Supra)

Courtney & Fairbairn Ltd v Tolaini Bros (Hotels) Ltd (1975) 1 WLR 297

Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd (1988) 1 All ER 348

4. Sale of Goods Act 1979, section 10(1); section 39; section 49(1)

8. Sale of Goods Act 1979, Section 20

10. Sale of Goods Act 1979, Section 10(2)

McDougall v Aeromarine of Emsworth (1958) 3 All ER 431

Widness Foundry Ltd v Cellulose Acetate Silk Co Ltd (1933) AC 20

12. Sale of Goods Act 1979, section 37

13. Aswan Engineering Establishment Co Ltd v Lupdine Ltd (1987) 1 All ER 135. Sale of Goods Act 1979, section 14(3)

15. Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd (1973) 1 QB 233

16. Sale of Goods Act 1979 sections 14 and 15

Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

Rees Hough Ltd v Redland Reinforced Plastics Ltd (1983) NLJ

White Cross Equipment v Farrell (1982) Unreported

17. R W Green Ltd v Cade Bros Farm (1978) 1 Lloyds Rep 602

19. Croudace Construction Ltd v Cawoods Concrete Products Ltd (1978) 2 Lloyds Rep 55

23. Sale of Goods Act 1979, sections 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

Aluminium Industrie Vaasen BV v Romalpa Ltd (1976) 1 WLR 676

Clough Mill Ltd v Martin (1985) 1 WLR 111

Pfeiffer Weinkellerei-Weineinkauf GmbH v Arbuthnot Factors Ltd (1988) 1 WLR

Tatung (UK) Ltd v Galex Telsure and Others (1989) BCC 325

Armour v Thyssen Edelstahlwerke (1990) 3 All ER 481


General Conditions of Sale

1.2 General

 

In these General Conditions of Sale, the "Company" means . . . . . . . , the "goods" means any item of whatsoever nature which is to be sold by the Company; the "Purchaser" means the person firm or body corporate which buys or has agreed to buy the goods.


These General Conditions of Sale shall apply to and form part of every contract of sale entered into by the Company. All orders are accepted and executed on the understanding that the Purchaser is bound by these General Conditions of Sale. Where there is any inconsistency between these General Conditions of Sale and any conditions which the Purchaser seeks to impose, these General Conditions of Sale shall prevail.

No contract of sale shall come into being unless and until the Purchaser has accepted these General Conditions of Sale either expressly or by implication.

 

1.2 A contract should begin with a definition of the parties, and any other terms requiring definition.

The remainder of this clause concerns the formation of the contract. One should note that although sellers and buyers may declare their intentions regarding formation of the contract, there is no guarantee that these clauses will be successful:
Butler Machine Tool Co Ltd v Ex-Cell-O-Ltd 1979 1. All. E.R. 965

1.3 Limits of Contract

The contract includes only such goods, accessories and work as are specified in the quotation or acknowledgement accompanying these General Conditions of Sale.

 

1.3 Clauses of this kind help to define the scope of the contract. For major contracts, a list of contract documents is desirable.

1.4 Prices

(a) The price payable for goods shall unless otherwise stated by the Company in writing be the list price of the Company current at the date of despatch and in the case of an order for delivery by instalments the price payable for each instalment shall be the list price of the Company current at the date of despatch of such instalment.

 

1.4 This clause must be tailored to the client's specific needs. The important points are to state how the price is to be ascertained, whether or not it is adjustable (see Butler Machine Tool Co. Ltd v Ex-Cell-O Ltd 1979), and what additions are to be made to the price.

(b) Unless otherwise expressly stated to be firm for a period the Company's prices are subject to variation to take account of variations in wages, materials and other costs. The Company accordingly reserves the right to adjust the invoice price without notice by the amount of any increase or decrease in such costs after the price is quoted.

 

 

In practice, the question of whether a price is fixed or variable, and if fixed, for how long, is one for negotiation.

(c) All prices are exclusive of Value Added Tax and this will be charged at the applicable rate and recoverable as part of the price by the Company.


1.5 Payment

(a) Unless otherwise agreed in writing, payment is due in full on delivery of the goods.
(Company's own settlement discount procedure to be inserted here if appropriate.)

(b) Where the Contract is to be or may be fulfilled in separate instalments, deliveries or parts, payment for each instalment, delivery or part shall be made as if the same constituted a separate contract.

(c) Time for payment shall be of the essence of the contract.

(d) If payment is not made when due then without prejudice to any other rights it may have the Company shall be entitled to charge interest on the amount which is overdue at 2% above the base rate of ........ Bank plc calculated on a daily basis.

(e) Additionally and without prejudice to its other rights the Company shall be entitled to recover all direct expenses reasonably incurred by the Company in collecting or attempting to collect amounts of the price outstanding.

1.4 The contract should always make it clear when payment is due. In some cases the expression "delivery" may require definition, although this has not been done here. These particular conditions do, however, aim to speed up cash flow by giving the facility to invoice for instalments.

It is also made clear that time for payment is an essential term, i.e. a condition of this contract, and the seller has attempted to improve upon the remedies for non-payment given to him by common law and by statute (e.g. by charging interest), but without prejudice to his common law and statutory rights.

(f) If the Purchaser fails to make any payment when due in accordance with these General Conditions of Sale, the Company reserves the right in its absolute discretion and without prejudice to any of its other rights or remedies to suspend all further deliveries until such payment has been made in full or, at the Company's option, to cancel the balance of the order. In either case the Company shall hold the Purchaser liable for costs incurred in respect of goods in course of manufacture or ready for despatch.


(g) The Company shall be entitled to bring an action for the price or part thereof whether or not the property in the goods has passed.

 

1.5(g) This is to counteract the effect of Sale of Goods Act 1979, Section 49 (1).

1.6 Credit

Any credit shall be subject to the Company being satisfied as to the Purchaser's credit references, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, the Company may (in its absolute discretion), having informed the Purchaser that the goods are ready for despatch, refrain from delivering the goods until such time as the Purchaser tenders the purchase money to the Company together with any outstanding amounts which may be due to the Company on any account whatsoever.

 

1.6 If credit is not given, because the conditions upon which it is to be given are not satisfied, then the right of lien of the seller may be exercised.


1.7 Carriage

(a) Where the value of any order exceeds £. . . the cost of delivery of the goods to the Purchaser's premises on the mainland of Great Britain shall be included in the contract price.

 

1.7 This clause is to clarify the position as to carriage and to permit additional charges.


(b) In all other cases the prices are exclusive of carriage and insurance to the Purchaser's premises.

1.8 Packing

Where it is necessary to despatch goods in crates, cases, pallets, stillages or skids or other such packing, a charge will be made for this. Unless otherwise specified this amount will be credited in full on the return, within one month, of such crates, skids, stillages and pallets etc. in good condition carriage paid. No charge is made for any other form of packaging and no credit will be allowed for its return.

 

1.8 This is an example of the kind of "practical" clause which can only be drafted as a result of careful consultation with the client, to find out where problems are likely to occur.

1.9 Loss or Damage in Transit

When the price quoted includes delivery, the Company shall repair or replace free of charge goods damaged in transit or not delivered in accordance with the Advice Note provided that the Company is given written notification of such damage or non delivery within such time (being not more than . . . days) as will enable the Company to comply with the carrier's conditions of carriage as affecting loss or damage in transit, or, where delivery is made by the Company's own transport, within . . . days after receipt of the Advice Note. Notwithstanding the above undertaking, the Company will only consider claims for alleged shortage if they are received within two working days of the receipt of the goods by the Purchaser together with sufficient information to enable the Company properly to identify the shortage including the Advice Note number, case number and condition of case.

 

1.9 This clause is about risk allocation and the details necessary to administer a claim for loss or damage in transit.

 

It is important to relate the seller's liability for loss or damage in transit to the seller's position regarding their acceptance of liability by the carrier.

1.10 Samples

Any samples submitted with the Company's quotation or at the Purchaser's request must be returned within ninety days of receipt and the Company shall be entitled to charge for them if they are not so returned.

 

1.10 Companies supplying goods or services do not usually charge for samples, but may find it inconvenient if expensive samples are not returned. This clause is therefore not needed in cases where samples are non-returnable, but may be a useful provision to enforce the prompt return of more costly, returnable samples.


1.11 Delivery

(a) All times or dates for delivery of the goods are given in good faith but are approximate only and shall not be of the essence of the contract.

(b) All times or dates for delivery shall be calculated from the date of acceptance by the Company of the order of the Purchaser, or from the date of receipt by the Company from the Purchaser of all information, instructions and drawings as shall be necessary to enable the Company to carry out the order, whichever shall be the later.

(c) Unless otherwise stated in writing the Company shall be entitled to make partial deliveries of the goods.

(d) (First alternative)

The Company shall not be liable in any way whatsoever for the consequences of any delay in delivery or in the carrying out of any work in the contract.

OR

(d) (Second alternative)

Subject to the foregoing, if a delivery date or schedule of delivery dates has been agreed under this contract between the Company and the Purchaser, and if there is any delay in delivery for any cause within the reasonable control of the Company, and if as a result of such delay the Purchaser shall have suffered any loss, the Purchaser shall as liquidated and ascertained damages and in substitution for all other rights of the Purchaser in respect of the said delay be entitled to deduct from payment due in respect of the portion of the goods the subject of the delay 1% of the value of such payment for each week by which delivery is delayed subject to a maximum of 10% thereof.

1.11 Sellers will have to give delivery dates or periods to their purchasers, for commercial reasons. However, they will wish, so far as possible, to give them in such a way as not to be liable for delay. If time for delivery is of the essence, the purchaser may cancel the contract, as well as claiming damages.

See Kolfer Plant v Tilbury Plant, (1977) 121 S.J. 390.

and McDougall v Aero Marine (1958) 3 All. E.R. 431.

Clause 10 of these Conditions attempts to build up a position where the seller avoids liability for delay in delivery, through a series of sub-clauses. If a total exclusion of liability for delay is unacceptable to the Purchaser, the second alternative of clause (d) may be used to limit the seller's liability.

1.12 Variations

(a) The Company shall be under no obligation to alter or vary any part of the contract or any work connected therewith. Any alteration to or addition to or amendment or other variation of the specification, including any increase or decrease in the quantity of the goods or any alteration to any drawings or to the quality, performance, weight or measurements of any goods or any alteration or variation of advised delivery schedules, shall, if requested by the Purchaser, be subject to the agreement of the Company, with such alteration or addition to the price and to delivery dates or schedules as may be required by the Company, and shall not be binding upon the Company unless and until accepted by the Company in writing.

 

1.12 There is no legal obligation to vary goods or work supplied under a contract. Contracts may provide for variations, subject to certain conditions. Sometimes purchasers expect to be able to vary goods and services as of right, and this clause makes it clear that mutual written agreement is required under this contract, with adjustments to price and delivery schedules where applicable.

(b) In the event of any variation or suspension of the work by the Purchaser's instructions or lack of instructions the Company shall be entitled to adjust the contract price to reflect costs involved, and to adjust delivery dates or schedules.

1.13 Storage

If the Company does not receive forwarding instructions sufficient to enable it to despatch the goods within fourteen days after notification that the goods are ready for delivery or that they have been tested under Clause 14, the Purchaser shall thereupon take delivery or arrange for storage. If the Purchaser does not take delivery or arrange for storage as aforesaid, the Company shall be entitled to invoice and be paid for the goods as though the goods have been duly delivered in accordance with these General Conditions of Sale and the Company may arrange storage either at the Company's own works or elsewhere on the Purchaser's behalf and all charges for storage, insurance or demurrage shall be payable by the Purchaser.

 

1.13 This clause builds upon and extends the rights conferred on the seller by section 37 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979.

1.14 Performance

Any performance figures given by the Company are based on its experience and are such as the Company expects to obtain under the conditions of its standard tests at its works.

 

1.14 This is to avoid any doubt as to what any figures for performance of goods represent.

1.15 Inspection and Tests

The Company's products are carefully inspected, and, where practicable submitted to its standard tests at the Company's works before despatch. If tests other than those specified or tests in the presence of the Purchaser or its representatives are required, these will be charged for. In the event of any delay on the Purchaser's part in attending tests after the Purchaser has received seven days notice that the Company is ready to perform the tests, the tests will proceed in the Purchaser's absence and the Purchaser accordingly agrees herein to accept and pay for such tests as if they had been performed in the Purchaser's presence.

 

1.15 This clause is to avoid any doubt about the nature of tests included in the price, and the seller's right in certain cases to perform tests in the absence of the purchaser.

 

An alternative is to allow for alteration of the date for tests, with corresponding changes to the price and delivery date.

1.16 Descriptive Matter and Illustrations

All descriptions and illustrations and particulars of weights and dimensions issued by the Company in catalogues, price lists, advertising matter and forwarding specifications are by way of general descriptions and approximate only, and shall not form part of any contract or give rise to any liability on the part of the Company.

It is the policy of the Company to endeavour to develop and improve its products, and accordingly the Company reserves the right to change all specifications without prior notification or public announcement pursuant to such policy. Provided that nothing in this Clause shall oblige the Purchaser to accept goods which do not reasonably comply with the contract.

 

1.16 Statements made in brochure material, etc, may give rise to representations, or even be construed as terms of the contract. This clause aims, within reason, to lesson the chances of liability for misrepresentation or breach of conditions or warranties.

 

1.17 Warranty

(a) The Company will make good by repair, or at the Company's option by the supply of a replacement, defects which, under proper storage and use appear in the goods within the period of twelve calendar months after the goods have been delivered and arise solely from faulty design (other than design made or furnished by the Purchaser), materials or workmanship.

 

1.17 This clause aims to be positive as to terms about quality given expressly by the seller, and subsequently goes on to impose certain requirements upon the purchaser, as conditions of liability. It is thought that these requirements are not unreasonable within the Unfair Contract Terms ACT 1977.

(b) The Warranty given in this Clause is subject to the following provisos, namely:

(i) that the Purchaser shall have followed all instructions issued by the Company in relation to the goods;

(ii) that in the case of defects which would have been reasonably apparent to the Purchaser on reasonable examination of the goods on delivery, the Purchaser shall notify the Company of the defects in writing within fourteen working days of delivery;

 

Time limits for reporting of defects by a purchaser to a seller must be fair.

 

R.W. Green Ltd v Cade Bros Farm (1978) 1 Lloyds Rep 602.

(iii) that in the case of any other defects, the Purchaser shall notify the Company of the defects in writing within seven working days of the date when the defect becomes apparent;


(iv) that where in discharge of its obligations under the Warranty given in this Clause the Company agrees that the Purchaser may undertake any repair or remedial work on its behalf, the cost of such work shall be agreed in writing between the Purchaser and the Company before the commencement of any such repair or remedial work.

 

1.18 Rejection

 

Unless otherwise agreed in writing, and subject to Clause 16 hereof (WARRANTY), goods rejected as not complying with the contract must be rejected within fourteen working days of delivery to the Purchaser's premises or to such other place as the Purchaser shall have specified.

 

 

1.19 Return of Goods

In no circumstances may goods supplied against a firm order be returned without the Purchaser having first applied for and obtained the written consent of the Company. A handling charge may be deducted from any credit allowed by the Company where it is established that the reason for the return of goods was not the subject of Clause 8 hereof or due to any error on the part of the Company.

 

Notes to clauses 1.17, 1.18, 1.19

 

There is no blanket limit upon or disclaimer of liability, but certain remedies of the purchaser for defective goods are restricted or made subject to conditions.

 

There is a limit on liability in the sense that "consequential loss", as defined in clause 19, is excluded. The expression as defined here means that liability for personal injury, death, damage to property and other physical losses is not excluded.

 

1.20 Consequential Loss

Save as may be expressly provided for herein the Company shall not be liable for any consequential loss suffered by the Purchaser, and in particular the Company shall not be liable for any costs claims or damages or expenses arising out of any tortious act or omission or any breach of contract or statutory duty calculated by reference to profits income production or accruals or by reference to accrual of such costs claims damages or expenses on a time basis.

 

An exemption from liability does not exempt a contractor from his common law liability in tort unless the words specifically preclude such liability.

Dorset County Council v Southern Felt Roofing Co (1989) F.T. November 24, 1989 CA

 

 

1.21 Patents

The Purchaser will indemnify the Company against all damages penalties costs losses and expenses suffered by the Company or for which it may become liable in respect of the infringement of any intellectual property including (but without limitation) any patent copyright design right trade mark trade name or know-how arising out of the Company's manufacture of goods in accordance with any specification design drawings or other data supplied by the Purchaser or its servants or agents.

 

1.21 Purchasers occasionally design items to be made by sellers, and this clause aims to protect sellers against possible infringement of intellectual property rights in such circumstances.

 

1.22 Copyright and Confidentiality

All drawings descriptions and other information submitted by the Company shall remain the property of the Company together with the copyright therein, and shall be treated as confidential and shall not be disclosed to any person except as permitted in writing by the Company.

 

1.22 This is to protect the seller's own property in drawings and other information.

 

1.23 Force Majeure and Other Circumstances

 

The Company shall be entitled without liability on its part and without prejudice to its other rights, to terminate the contract or any unfulfilled part thereof, or at its option to suspend or make partial deliveries or extend the time or times for delivery, if the manufacture of the goods by the Company or the Company's suppliers, or the delivery of the goods or the performance by the Company of any of its obligations under the contract is hindered or delayed whether directly or indirectly by reason of the Purchaser failing to furnish necessary instructions or information, or by war or other hostilities, civil commotion, act of God, government action or legislation, interruption of transport, strike, lock out or other form of industrial action, accidents or stoppages to works, shortage of labour materials equipment fuel or power, breakdown of machinery or any other cause whatsoever beyond the reasonable control of the Company or its sub-contractors, whether or not such cause exists at the date of the order.

 

1.23 Sellers of goods and services should always protect themselves against circumstances beyond their control. The law of frustration is insufficient, and a properly drafted "force majeure" clause will protect the seller against circumstances falling short of frustration.


1.24 Passing of Property and Risk

 

(a) The risk in the goods shall pass to the Purchaser immediately on delivery of the goods to the Purchaser.

(b) The property in the goods shall remain with the Company, which reserves the right to dispose of the goods until payment in full for all goods which have been supplied at any time by the Company to the Purchaser has been received by the Company, or until such time as the Purchaser sells the goods to its customers by way of bona fide sale at full market value in the ordinary course of business. While the goods remain the property of the Company the Purchaser shall keep the goods identifiable and separate from all other goods in its possession.

 

1.24 Clause 23 is a retention of title clause, passing risk upon delivery to the Purchaser, while the property in the goods remains with the seller until the seller is paid or until the goods are sub-sold in good faith in the ordinary course of business.

 

(c) Until such payment as aforesaid has been received in full by the Company the Purchaser shall be under an obligation to redeliver the goods to the Company if the Company so requires and the Company shall be entitled at any time to retake possession of the goods and for that purpose to enter upon any land or premises of the Purchaser where the goods may be for the time being. The Company shall be entitled, where the goods have been fixed or attached to any other product, to detach the goods in order to recover possession of them. Such redelivery or retaking of possession shall be without prejudice to the obligation of the Purchaser to purchase the goods.

 

The clause attempts to confer upon the seller rights of repossession of the goods, rights of entry to do so, and the right to trace and recover the proceeds of sub-sales.

 

(d) If the Purchaser sells any of the goods before the property in the goods has passed to the Purchaser, the Purchaser is authorised only to sell for the account of the Company and to hold the proceeds of sale as agent and fiduciary of the Company, provided that as between the Purchaser and its customer the Purchaser shall sell in the Purchaser's own name, as principal, and shall have no authority to enter into any contract on behalf of the company.


1.25 Breach

 

In the event of the Purchaser committing any breach of this contract, or if any distress or execution is levied upon the Purchaser, his goods or assets, or if the Purchaser enters into any negotiations for arrangement or composition with or for the benefit of his creditors or becomes bankrupt or if any petition in bankruptcy shall be presented against him, or if, being a corporate body, the Purchaser shall be wound up or if any resolution is proposed or petition presented to wind up the Purchaser (not being a members' voluntary winding up for the purpose of reconstruction or amalgamation without insolvency), or if a receiver of the Purchaser's assets or undertaking or any part thereof shall be appointed or if the Purchaser shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts, or if an administration order shall be made against the Purchaser the Company shall be entitled, without prejudice to any other claim or right or remedy which it may have, forthwith to suspend any or all deliveries until the default has been made good or to determine the contract or any unfulfilled part thereof.

 

1.25 It is standard, in a contract such as this, to have a clause permitting the seller to take action to protect himself in the event of insolvency or breach of contract by the Purchaser. There are many different forms of these clauses, and some go less far than this example, while others go further, in attempting to provide against every possible circumstance affecting the purchaser's financial soundness.

 

Sellers may sometimes find it desirable to delete the words in brackets, although Purchasers will probably wish them to be retained.


1.26 Arbitration

 

If any time any question, dispute or difference whatsoever shall arise between the Purchaser and the Company upon or in relation to or in connection with the contract, either party may give the other notice in writing of the existence of such question, dispute or difference, and the same shall be referred to the arbitration of a person to be mutually agreed upon, or failing agreement within 30 days of receipt of such notice, of some person appointed by the President for the time being of the Institution of . . . . . in Great Britain. A submission to arbitration under this Clause shall be deemed to be a submission to a sole arbitrator pursuant to the Arbitration Act 1950 or any statutory modification or re-enactment thereof. Any such arbitration shall be held in London, England.

 

1.26 An arbitration clause is optional. Some clients may oppose the inclusion of such a clause.
In this particular clause, the name of the Institution referred to must be completed. There are various methods of appointing arbitrators, and the merits of different methods should be considered.
The last sentence of this clause is a matter of choice and convenience.

 

1.27 Choice of Law

 

All contracts to which these General Conditions of Sale apply shall be governed by and construed in accordance with English Law.

 

The headings to the clauses of these General Conditions are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not affect their interpretation.

 

1.27 It is normal to include a "choice of law" clause, and unless Scots Law, or the law of any other country, is specified by the client, the appropriate law is English Law.

 


2. Further Drafting Points

The following are points which may be applied to commercial contracts generally, and not only to a contract of sale. A number of these points are illustrated by recent decisions of the courts.

2.1 Incorporation of Terms

Not all contracts are individually negotiated, or subjected to legal or commercial scrutiny. Some conditions of contract are imposed by one party upon another by relatively informal methods and in this context the ruling in Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd (1988) 1 All ER 348 , may be relevant.

Where a condition in a contract is particularly onerous or unusual and would not generally be known to the other party, the party seeking to enforce that condition has to show that it has been fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention. In the above case, a contract (preceded by oral discussion) was concluded when goods were delivered, accompanied by a delivery note, and the goods were accepted by a telephone call by the customer. The issue was whether or not the printed terms on the front of the delivery note had been incorporated into the contract. The Court of Appeal held that as Condition 2 of the conditions provided for a very high and exorbitant rate of charge for retention of the bailed goods for longer than the stated period of 14 days, special attention should have been drawn towards this condition, and since this was not done, the condition was not a term of the contract, and payment would be on a quantum meruit basis.

Obiter per Dillon L.J.: "the defendants would have had a strong case for saying that condition 2 was void and unenforceable as a penalty clause; but that point was not taken in the court below or in the notice of appeal." See note 2.2, below.

2.2 The Rule against Penalties

As may be seen from the dictum in the above case, the rule against penalties has lost none of its force, and is potentially applicable to a wide variety of situations.

"Parties are free to agree to whatever exclusion or modification of all types of obligations as they please within the limits that the agreement must retain the legal characteristics of a contract; and must not offend against the equitable rule against penalties: that is to say it must not impose upon the breaker of a primary obligation a general secondary obligation to pay to the other party a sum of money that is manifestly intended to be in excess of the amount which would fully compensate the other party for the loss sustained by him in consequence of the breach of the primary obligation."

Photoproduction v Securicor Ltd (1980) A.C. 827, 850, per Lord Diplock

NB. Lord Diplock was leaving out of consideration the Unfair Contract Terms Act, which was not relevant to the issue.)

The rule against penalties was also considered in Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth (1987) 2 WLR 7 (see note 2.3 below), and would have affected the outcome of that case, but for the application of another clause of the contract which was not subject to the rule.

2.3 Clauses defining the character of obligations

It is important to define accurately the character of an obligation, and the effect that a breach of that obligation will have upon the contract.

See, for example, Wickman Tools v Schuler AG (1974) AC 235 , in which a clause defining an obligation as "a condition" had to be read together with another clause of the same contract which provided that either of the parties could determine the contract if the other party had committed a material breach of its obligations and had failed to remedy the same within 60 days of being required in writing to do so. Thus there was no right to determine this contract summarily on account of breach of condition.

A clause which expressly assigns a particular obligation to the category of conditions is not a clause which purports to fix the damages for breach of the obligation, and is not subject to the law governing penalty clauses.

Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth (1987) 2 WLR 7 .

In this case, a clause in a lease agreement for a computer required the defendant to pay the plaintiff all arrears of rentals, if rentals became overdue, together with all rentals which were to have fallen due, and damages for breach of the agreement. The Court of Appeal held that in the absence of a repudiatory breach this clause was a penalty. However, another clause in the same contract stated that punctual payment of each quarterly rental was to be of the essence of the contract . The consequence was that delay in performance was to be treated as going to the root of the contract without regard to the magnitude of the breach. Thus although one clause was to be regarded as a penalty, the clause making time for payment of the essence was independently enforceable, and the plaintiffs were able to terminate the contract and recover damages in respect of future instalments.

2.4 Unfair Contract Terms and Entire Agreement Clauses

The scope of the Unfair Contract Terms Act is well-known to all practitioners, and detailed discussion is unnecessary here. However, it is fairly common for parties to a commercial contract which has been preceded by discussions and negotiations to draft an "entire agreement" clause, in effect stating that the written agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and supersedes and replaces all previous negotiations, whether oral or written, and that accordingly no representation or collateral agreement exists between the parties or has been relied upon by either of the parties. A question which has arisen recently is whether or not such a clause is vulnerable to attack under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

At first sight it might appear that Section 8 of the Act would apply. This section deals with the exclusion or restriction of liability for misrepresentation, and subjects any term purporting to do this to the requirement of reasonableness of Section 11 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

However, in McGrath v Shah (1989) 57 P&CR 452 , it was held that Section 8 of the Unfair contract Terms Act 1977 does not invalidate a contractual provision that the contract contains the entire terms of the contract. The plaintiff and the defendant had entered into a contract for the sale of a house. The plaintiff served a notice to complete on the defendant. The defendant alleged that the notice was invalid due to misrepresentations made before the contract, which were contractual terms, breach of which entitled the defendant to rescind.

It was held that Section 8 did not apply to a contractual provision which defined where the terms of the contract were to be found, consequently representations made prior to the contract could not form part of the terms of the contract.

This decision was in the context of a sale of land . Each case must of course depend upon its context and the wording of each clause.

2.5 Waiver

It is possible that in any contractual context the issue of waiver might apply. Indeed, in the case of Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth (1987) , the facts of which have already been discussed, Mustill L.J. stated that if the line of argument which eventually prevailed had been developed from the outset, the defendant might have found an answer based on waiver which the court was precluded from assessing for want of the necessary facts.

The law of waiver has recently received exhaustive discussion in Procter & Gamble Philippine Manufacturing Corp v Peter Cremer GmbH & Co (1988) 3 All ER 843 . Although this case was inconclusive, in that the Commercial Court could not interfere with a finding of the GAFTA board of appeal that the buyers had not waived their right to reject a cargo, since it was a finding of fact and not of law, nonetheless the case demonstrates the importance which may be attached to the issue of waiver in commercial contracts.

Some parties to contracts accordingly include "non-waiver" clauses in their contracts, of which an example is given below:

"No provision of the contract shall be considered to be waived by the Purchaser unless such notice of waiver is given in writing by the Purchaser. Even if such notice has been given, such waiver shall not be construed as being a waiver of any past or future right of the Purchaser under the provisions of the contract unless expressly stipulated therein. Failure of the Purchaser to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms of the contract, or failure or delay of the Purchaser to exercise any act, right or remedy provided by the contract or by law shall not relieve the Seller of liability under any guarantee or of any obligations under the contract and shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any rights of the Purchaser to insist upon strict fulfilment of the contract or of any of the Purchaser's rights or remedies as to the goods."

These clauses, which, in a variety of formulations, are included in many national and international contracts, are presumably effective, although the writer is not aware of any conclusive decision of the courts as to their effectiveness. Care is needed, because, as the Procter & Gamble case shows, the true juridical basis of waiver has yet to be finally determined by the courts. However, if the estoppel basis of waiver is the correct one, and if it is a question of fact and degree, then a protective clause may lend weight to the argument of the party wishing to deny the waiver.

2.6 Intention to create legal relations / guarantees / letter of comfort

There are many ways in which a party to a commercial agreement may accept legal liability for the performance or non-performance of obligations, including obligations of third parties, such as subsidiary companies. Guarantees and indemnities are examples.

However, it is fairly common for companies not wishing to give guarantees or indemnities in respect of obligations of third parties to offer "letters of comfort". These have posed problems of draftsmanship, since clearly the party issuing such a document is trying to achieve something short of a legally binding obligation (why else would they decline to give a guarantee?), while the party requiring such a document is hoping to extract something of value from the giver of the document.

The locus classicus is now Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysian Mining Corporation Berhad (1989) 1 WLR 379 .

Here the relevant clause of a letter of comfort stated"

It is our policy to ensure that the business of MMC Metals Ltd is conducted in such a way that MMC Metals Ltd is at all times in a position to meet its liabilities to you under the above arrangements."

This was written in relation to loans amounting to £10 million made to MMC Ltd, a subsidiary of the defendant. MMC Ltd ceased trading, and Kleinwort Benson Ltd brought an action against Malaysian Mining Corporation Ltd for, among other things, breach of warranty, alleging that the undertaking was legally binding.

The Court of Appeal, reversing the Queen's Bench, held that the clause in question was a statement as to present policy, and did not amount to an express promise that such policy would be continued in the future. The parties had both known and understood the concept of a comfort letter to which parties resort when a party does not wish to give a guarantee, and the letter was drafted in terms which did not express any contractual promise. The obligation assumed was a moral and not a legal one.

Clearly this case demonstrates the care that is needed in scrutinizing the subtleties of wording of documents in this field.

2.7 A Problem of Credibility

Parties to commercial contracts are permitted a great deal of freedom in the wording that they choose to confer benefits or place burdens upon each other. However, the drafting may mean that literal interpretation of certain clauses may strain credibility.

 

 


 

 

 

Wildy & Sons website

Wildy's new books RSS feed

  

 

 

 

 

web counter